· 9/10/2009
Cicoria v. Cole
Citations
- 215 P.3d 402
- 222 Ariz. 428
- 564 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 14
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Courts read statutes relating to the same subject matter in connection with each other, “as though they constitute[] one law.”
- “Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
- “Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
- court “will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself’ and will not extend a statute to matters that do not fall within its express provisions
- acceptance of special action jurisdiction is “highly discretionary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Downie, Swann, Gemmill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.