Skip to main content
· 9/10/2009

Cicoria v. Cole

Citations

  • 215 P.3d 402
  • 222 Ariz. 428
  • 564 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 14
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Courts read statutes relating to the same subject matter in connection with each other, “as though they constitute[] one law.”
  • “Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
  • “Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
  • court “will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself’ and will not extend a statute to matters that do not fall within its express provisions
  • acceptance of special action jurisdiction is “highly discretionary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downie, Swann, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.