Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/10/2009

Cicoria v. Cole

Citations

215 P.3d 402
222 Ariz. 428
564 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 14
2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Courts read statutes relating to the same subject matter in connection with each other, “as though they constitute[] one law.”
“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
“Courts will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself . . . .”
court “will not read into a statute something that is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as indicated by the statute itself’ and will not extend a statute to matters that do not fall within its express provisions
acceptance of special action jurisdiction is “highly discretionary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downie, Swann, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.