Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public Safety Retirement Fund Manager Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that subsequent legislation, which clarifies a statutory scheme, though “not necessarily controlling, is strongly indicative of the legislature’s original intent”
• where legislature specifically used a term in certain places within a statute and excluded it in another place, court will not read the term into the section from which it was excluded
• “Where the legislature has specifically used a term in certain places within a statute and excluded it in another place, courts will not read that term into the section from which it was excluded.”
• appellate court will affirm superior court’s decision if it is correct for any reason
• “Where the legislature has specifically used a term in certain places within a statute and excluded it in another place, courts will not read that term into the section from which it was excluded.”
• “Where the legislature has specifically used a term in certain places within a statute and excluded it in another place, courts will not read that term into the section from which it was excluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).