Lind v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the hospital draws the entire sample ‘for medical purposes’ within the meaning of the statute, and the officer’s subsequent statutory request for a portion of the sample does not violate any rights of a defendant”
• recognizing that court of appeals is “bound by our supreme court’s determinations”
• recognizing that court of appeals is “bound by our supreme court’s determinations”
• holding that “the hospital draws the entire sample ‘for medical purposes’ within the meaning of the statute, and the officer’s subsequent statutory request for a portion of the sample does not violate any rights of a defendant”
• declining to “revisit” Codo “[b]ecause we are bound by our supreme court’s determinations”
• based on Cocio, declining to address whether “a blood sample presents an exigent circumstance” even when police requested portion of blood sample previously drawn by hospital for medical purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).