State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond Fikes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e may not construe part of a statute in a way that would render any other part of the statute void, superfluous, contradictory or insignificant.” (quoting State v. Larson, 222 Ariz. 341, ¶ 14, 214 P.3d 429, 432 (App.2009
• “[W]e may not construe part of a statute in a way that would render any other part of the statute void, superfluous, contradictory or insignificant.” (quoting State v. Larson, 222 Ariz. 341, ¶ 14, 214 P.3d 429, 432 (App.2009) (internal quotation marks omitted))
• we construe statutes to not render any part superfluous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).