Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/22/2004

Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.

Citations

88 P.3d 565
207 Ariz. 495
424 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that whether original homeowner’s observations of transient unevenness in the floors constituted discovery of soil-compaction defect was a question for the finder of fact
stating that Section 12-552 “sets a period of time within which claims must be brought regardless of when the cause of action may accrue”
explaining that the statute of repose “sets a period of time within which claims must be brought regardless of when the cause of action may accrue” and recognizing “a claim may be barred if it does not accrue within the allowable statutory period”
if statute’s “language is unambiguous, we give effect to the language and do not use other rules of statutory construction in its interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gemmill, Thompson, Winthrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.