Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether original homeowner’s observations of transient unevenness in the floors constituted discovery of soil-compaction defect was a question for the finder of fact
• stating that Section 12-552 “sets a period of time within which claims must be brought regardless of when the cause of action may accrue”
• explaining that the statute of repose “sets a period of time within which claims must be brought regardless of when the cause of action may accrue” and recognizing “a claim may be barred if it does not accrue within the allowable statutory period”
• if statute’s “language is unambiguous, we give effect to the language and do not use other rules of statutory construction in its interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).