· 8/15/1980
Cicala v. Disability Review Board
Citations
- 418 A.2d 205
- 288 Md. 254
- 1980 Md. LEXIS 203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the issue ... was not raised during the administrative proceeding, it was not properly raised in the judicial review proceeding, and therefore is not properly before us.”
- failure to argue at administrative hearing that the board did not have a report that it was required to obtain and consider prevented consideration of that issue on judicial review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.