Heft v. Maryland Racing Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying numerous Commission regulations, and pointing out that “[t]he statute and ‘the Commission’s rules and regulations provide a comprehensive scheme for the regulation of horse racing in Maryland,’ ” quoting Silbert v. Ramsey, 301 Md. 96, 105, 482 A.2d 147, 152 (1984)
• “[A] person may not obtain judicial review of a matter when he or she failed to properly raise the matter before the agency.”
• “A court cannot substitute its discretion for the discretion of the [agency] where there is evidence that reasonably justifies the [agency’s] finding, even though the court may disagree with the [agency].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).