People's Counsel v. Surina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under the substantial evidence standard courts examine whether the administrative record contains “such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
• explaining that under the substantial evidence standard courts examine whether the administrative record contains “such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
• quoting, among others, Mayor & Aldermen of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co., 284 Md. 383, 398, 396 A.2d 1080, 1089 (1979)
• reviewing the decision of the Baltimore County Board of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the hearing officer
• reviewing the decision of the Baltimore County Board of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the hearing officer
• reviewing the decision of the Baltimore County Board of Appeals, which affirmed the decision of the hearing officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).