Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that res judicata is “rejected when [its] application would contravene an overriding public policy”
• noting that the rule of res judicata “[is] qualified or rejected when [its] application would contravene an overriding public policy”
• refusing to apply res judi-cata to bar Title VII action even though same claims were brought in prior NLRB hearing because the purposes and requirements of the NLRA and Title VII differ
• “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act should not be construed narrowly”
• discharged employee seeking reinstatement may represent current employees
• judicial determination prior to Civil Rights Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).