Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court erred in awarding attorneys' fees because the issue was never raised or decided by the ALJ
• holding that Md.Code (1984, 1999 Repl.Vol.) § 10-222, which is almost identical in language to HRS § 91-14(g
• noting that a reviewing court is restricted to the record made before the administrative agency
• noting that it is the final decision at the administrative level, not the decision of the reviewing court, which is the focus of each level of judicial review
• noting that it is the final decision at the administrative level, not the decision of the previously reviewing court, which is the focus of each level of judicial review
• noting that it is the final decision at the administrative level, not the decision of the previously reviewing court, which is the focus of each level of judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).