Christopher Sojka, J v. Bovis Lend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a party concedes a point by failing to respond to it in their response brief
• noting that a party concedes a point by failing to respond to it in their response brief
• “Sojka’s complaint contains one count and one claim, construction negligence, committed in a variety of ways.”
• abuse of discretion to disregard facts properly brought to the court’s attention through Rule 56.1 statement
• “One claim supported by multiple theories does not somehow become multiple claims.”
• “One claim supported by Hansen v. Bd. of Trs. of Hamilton Se. Sch. Corp., 551 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir. 2008). Consequently, the Court denies the plaintiffs’ motion to sever and remand these claims. multiple theories does not somehow become multiple claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).