Seventh Circuit· 7/10/2012
Christopher Sojka, J v. Bovis Lend
Citations
- 686 F.3d 394
- 2012 WL 2765031
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a party concedes a point by failing to respond to it in their response brief
- noting that a party concedes a point by failing to respond to it in their response brief
- “Sojka’s complaint contains one count and one claim, construction negligence, committed in a variety of ways.”
- abuse of discretion to disregard facts properly brought to the court’s attention through Rule 56.1 statement
- “One claim supported by multiple theories does not somehow become multiple claims.”
- “One claim supported by Hansen v. Bd. of Trs. of Hamilton Se. Sch. Corp., 551 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir. 2008). Consequently, the Court denies the plaintiffs’ motion to sever and remand these claims. multiple theories does not somehow become multiple claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Manion, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Herzog v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-02-13· cited 141×
- Kristen Zuppardi v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2014-10-24· cited 119×
- Aregood v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2018-09-13· cited 37×
- Robert McDaniel v. Salam SyedSeventh Circuit· 2024-09-16· cited 36×
- In re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Cheese Antitrust LitigationSeventh Circuit· 2015-09-01· cited 33×
- Calloway v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-10-17· cited 32×
- Mervyn v. Nelson Westerberg, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2015-10-30· cited 31×
- Selective Insurance Company of v. City of ParisSeventh Circuit· 2014-10-02· cited 21×
- Patricia Ferraro v. Hewlett-Packard CompanySeventh Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 17×
- Boyd v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2016-12-06· cited 16×
- Barrios v. Fashion Gallery, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2017-06-13· cited 16×
- Keen v. Teva Sales & Mktg., Inc.E.D. Illinois· 2018-03-20· cited 12×
- Northbound Group, Inc. v. Norvax, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2013-12-03· cited 9×
- Rebolar v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2012-09-21· cited 9×
- McCarty v. MenardsE.D. Illinois· 2018-08-08· cited 8×
- Brandt v. Charter Airlines, LLC (In re Equipment Acquisition Resources, Inc.)N.D. Illinois· 2014-06-18· cited 8×
- Jones-Huff v. HillN.D. Illinois· 2016-09-21· cited 6×
- Alexander v. Caraustar Industries, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2013-03-19· cited 6×
- Rusinowski v. Village of HillsideN.D. Illinois· 2014-02-06· cited 5×
- Essex Insurance v. Rho Chemical Co.N.D. Illinois· 2015-11-03· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1994-07-07· cited 1,541×
- Delapaz v. RichardsonSeventh Circuit· 2011-02-14· cited 275×
- Stevo v. FrasorSeventh Circuit· 2011-11-17· cited 249×
- Harney v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2008-05-30· cited 248×
- Michael C. Cichon v. Exelon Generation Company, L.L.C.Seventh Circuit· 2005-03-21· cited 228×
- Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Second Circuit· 1943-02-02· cited 194×
- Moore v. Vital Products, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-05-25· cited 110×
- Linda Florek v. Village of MundeleiSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-16· cited 89×
- Madden v. F.H. Paschen/S.N. Nielson, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-30· cited 62×
- Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-09-22· cited 50×
- O'Connell v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-05-20· cited 22×
- John Mesman and Judy Mesman v. Crane Pro Services, a Division of Konecranes, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2005-07-26· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.