Skip to main content
· 7/26/2005

John Mesman and Judy Mesman v. Crane Pro Services, a Division of Konecranes, Inc.

Citations

  • 409 F.3d 846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a product is negligently designed “only if the product could have been redesigned at a reasonable cost to avoid the risk of injury”
  • holding that a product is negligently designed “only if the product could have been redesigned at a reasonable cost to avoid the risk of injury”
  • explaining that Indiana has abandoned the patent-danger rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.