Skip to main content
· 3/21/2005

Michael C. Cichon v. Exelon Generation Company, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 401 F.3d 803
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 673
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4557
  • 2004 WL 3245457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district court may deem admitted the moving party’s facts when they are uncontroverted by a response and its accompanying record citations
  • finding that summary judgment in the defendant’s favor was required when the plaintiff’s only evidence was that the defendant’s witness was not worthy of belief
  • recognizing a district court may ignore and not consider additional facts a litigant proposes in violation of court orders or rules of procedure
  • considering Northern District of Illinois Local Rule 56.1, closely analogous to the Eastern District of Wisconsin local rule here
  • affirming district court decision to ignore additional facts submitted in response to movant’s 56.1 statement
  • upholding a district court’s decision to strike a party’s statement of facts where the district court made an explicit ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Coffey, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.