Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a party opposing summary judgment may not rely on allegations in her pleadings.”
• stating that need to file petition to permit withdrawal is waived \when accompanied by the appearance of other counsel.\
• noting that the Seventh Circuit has “repeatedly held the strict enforcement of [the local] rules”
• finding that the non-movant conceded the movant’s version of the facts by failing to submit a proper factual statement
• stating that “if the non-movant does not come forward with evidence that would reasonably permit the finder of fact to find in her favor on a material question, then the court must enter summary judgment against her.”
• noting that the Seventh Circuit has routinely sustained “the entry of summary judgment when the non-movant Faurecia is a global manufacturer of automobile parts with a facility located in Fort Wayne, IN. (ECF No. 41, ⁋⁋ 1-2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).