Selective Insurance Company of v. City of Paris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the district court’s order “contained all of the standard indicia of finality” and that “a separate entry on the court’s docket was made that same day”
• \We review denials of motions for reconsideration brought under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) for abuse of discretion.\
• hold- ing omission in judgment did not allow timely motion to re- consider three years later
• hold- ing omission in judgment did not allow timely motion to re- consider three years later
• hold- ing omission in judgment did not allow timely motion to re- consider three years later
• hold- ing omission in judgment did not allow timely motion to re- consider three years later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).