Canyon County v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Ninth 24 Circuit “requires that a plaintiff asserting injury to property to allege ‘concrete 25 financial loss’”
• explaining that to establish standing under § 1964(c), a civil RICO plaintiff must establish that the “alleged harm qualifies as injury to his business or property”
• noting that we may “affirm the dismissal on any ground supported by the record”
• identifying a “less rigorous” causation threshold at the dismissal stage of the proceedings (citations omitted)
• explaining that “a civil RICO plaintiff must show: (1) that his 22 alleged harm qualifies as injury to his business or property; and (2) that his harm was “by reason 23 of” the RICO violation, which requires the plaintiff to establish proximate causation”
• identifying “less rigorous” causation threshold at the dismissal stage of the proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).