Skip to main content
· 7/15/1999

Summit Medical Associates, P.C. v. Pryor

Citations

  • 180 F.3d 1326
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15952
  • 1999 WL 498531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Alabama governor, attorney general, and district attorneys were not proper defendants for the plaintiffs’ challenge to the civil liability provision of Alabama’s abortion statute
  • holding that the Alabama governor, attorney general, and district attorneys were not proper defendants for the plaintiffs’ challenge to the civil liability provision of Alabama’s abortion statute
  • holding that a party may not take an immediate appeal of a trial court's decision regarding standing because appealing such issue fails the collateral order doctrine
  • holding that pendent jurisdiction did not exist when resolution of the nonappealable issue was not necessary to resolve the appealable one
  • holding that a party may not take an immediate appeal of a trial court’s decision regarding standing because appealing such issue fails the collateral order doctrine
  • holding that a party may not take an immediate appeal of a trial court’s decision regarding standing because appealing such issue fails the collateral order doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Cox, Marcus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.