Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 7/31/2012

Chevron Corp. v. Donziger

Citations

  • 886 F. Supp. 2d 235
  • 2012 WL 3538749
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Rule 56(d) permits additional necessary discovery after a summary judgment motion
  • explaining the differing views of district courts nationwide on the application of Twombly and Iqbal to the pleading of affirmative defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

127 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.