Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district judge did not abuse her discretion in refusing to consider new evidence submitted with party's objections to magistrate judge's report and recommendation
• concluding that a reference to the need for additional discovery in a memorandum in opposition to summary judgment was not an adequate substitute for the required affidavit
• holding that where party failed to raise issue of prejudgment interest in connection with summary judgment motion, that altering judgment to add prejudgment interest was not “clerical” under Rule 60(a)
• holding that, although Rule 60(b)(6) was an available means of seeking prejudgment interest, court had erred in awarding it because the record did not support reopening the judgment in the interests of justice
• affirming grant of summary judgment despite Rule 56(f) movant’s assumption “that there would be discovery if it lost” on one of -the issues presented by the motion
• affirming dismissal of claim for pre-decision interest under Rule 60(b), where movant failed to state facts showing mistake, inadvertence and extraordinary circumstances for relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).