Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 10/10/2013

Chevron Corp. v. Donziger

Citations

  • 296 F.R.D. 168
  • 2013 WL 5575833
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking defense unless documents relevant to personal jurisdiction were produced by Oct. 24, 2013, which they were not
  • permitting sanctioned party to introduce belatedly produced documents at trial but reserving right to exclude “materials on a document-by-document basis . . . . as a sanction irrespective of whether they otherwise would have been admissible”
  • imposing sanctions for failure to comply with order on motion to compel
  • sanctions should put party in same position it would have been in if discovery had been produced originally
  • \Documents in the possession of a party's attorney may be considered to be within the control of the party.\
  • “Although the Plaintiff may take video recordings in depositions for his own purposes, those recordings taken by counsel will not be admissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.