Skip to main content
· 3/25/2002

Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 206 F.R.D. 615
  • 2002 WL 453242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying discovery stay where requested discovery imposed limited burden on plaintiff and where granting stay motion would substantially prejudice defendant
  • denying a motion to stay discovery on a particular issue because “any prejudice to [the movant] appears minimal and does not outweigh any prejudice to [the opposing parties] that might result from deferring discovery”
  • “To determine whether bifurcation is warranted, courts generally consider the following three factors: ‘1
  • “The moving party bears the burden of establishing that bifurcation is warranted.”
  • denying discovery stay request pending determination of summary-judgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.