Wamiq SATTAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that the Knight factors are “an operationalization of the ‘economic realties’ test” attributed to EEOC, as opposed to a separate test
• stating that “subjective evaluation criteria” such as an employee’s lack of “consistency, leader- ship, initiative, and responsibility skills” were a sufficient basis for an employer’s adverse action
• holding employer's use of subjective evaluation criteria did not render employee's termination discriminatory
• “[N]othing in Title VII bans outright the use of subjective evaluation 6 criteria.”
• \[N]othing in Title VII bans outright the use of subjective evaluation criteria.\
• “a supervisor does not, in his individual capacity, fall within Title VII’s definition of an employer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).