D. Kansas· 5/1/1995
Gheesling v. Chater
Citations
- 162 F.R.D. 649
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11487
- 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 965
- 1995 WL 472741
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when party seeking discovery fails to show relevance and court cannot otherwise determine how information sought is relevant, court will not compel requested discovery.
- limiting scope to plaintiffs employing unit
- limiting scope to plaintiff's employing unit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityD. Kansas· 2004-06-22· cited 97×
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.D. Kansas· 2000-04-18· cited 81×
- Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyD. Kansas· 2000-05-19· cited 62×
- Chavez v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.S.D. Indiana· 2002-03-25· cited 42×
- White v. Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc.D. Kansas· 2008-08-07· cited 40×
- Hammond v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.D. Kansas· 2003-08-15· cited 33×
- Owens v. Sprint/United Management Co.D. Kansas· 2004-06-02· cited 33×
- McBride v. Medicalodges, Inc.D. Kansas· 2008-04-11· cited 19×
- AKH Co. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceD. Kansas· 2014-06-18· cited 16×
- Moss v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.D. Kansas· 2007-04-03· cited 14×
- Helget v. City of HaysD. Kansas· 2014-06-25· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 2,321×
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 648×
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesFifth Circuit· 1990-02-28· cited 347×
- Deniece Scales v. J.C. Bradford and CompanySixth Circuit· 1991-03-19· cited 155×
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationThird Circuit· 1982-05-13· cited 144×
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-01-24· cited 89×
- Miller v. Doctor's General HospitalW.D. Oklahoma· 1977-08-17· cited 72×
- James v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1979-01-22· cited 57×
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.D. Kansas· 1991-02-14· cited 39×
- The JOSLIN DRY GOODS CO., Petitioner-Appellee, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1973-08-15· cited 33×
- Jones v. Commander, Kansas Army Ammunitions PlantD. Kansas· 1993-03-01· cited 27×
- Gagne v. ReddyD. Massachusetts· 1984-12-06· cited 25×
- Kelling v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.D. Kansas· 1994-07-14· cited 19×
- Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia· 1983-07-06· cited 16×
- Serina v. Albertson's, Inc.M.D. Florida· 1989-11-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.