Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that past injuries “may suffice to confer individual standing for monetary relief’ but “a plaintiff seeking injunctive relief must demonstrate a likelihood of future harm”
• holding that past injuries “may suffice to confer 36 individual standing for monetary relief” but “a plaintiff seeking injunctive relief must demonstrate a likelihood of future harm”
• noting that, to be domiciled in a state, a person must reside there and intend to remain indefinitely
• noting that the named plaintiffs’ failure to state a claim defeats standing
• rejecting argument that plaintiffs had standing because they might be tricked by deceptive offer in future
• declining to “give cognizance to this sort of ‘stop me before I buy again’ claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).