Justine Briggs v. Merck Sharp & Dohme

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that “either” of two plaintiffs groups may unilaterally trigger CAFA
• commenting in dicta that “ordinary 26 principles of collateral estoppel may apply in subsequent cases” after a bellwether
• “It has long been accepted that the time period to file an appeal generally runs from the denial of a timely motion for reconsideration, rather than from the date of the initial order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).