Bertulli v. Independent Ass'n of Continental Pilots

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not “abuse its discretion in finding the representatives to be adequate____ Further, since this is a 23(b)(3) class, dissatisfied class members have the right to opt out of the class”
• Rule 23(b)(3)’s superiority requirement was met by class of pilots bringing action under Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA
• “Standing is an inherent prerequisite to the class certification inquiry.”
• “Standing is an inherent prerequisite to the class certification inquiry.”
• “In order to demonstrate that the district court’s finding of superiority was an abuse of discretion, defendants must not merely show that individual actions are feasible; they must show that individual class members have an interest sufficient to make individual actions desirable.”
• “A class should be certified on a claim-by-claim basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).