Prado-Steiman Ex Rel. Prado v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such appeals “are inherently disruptive, time-consuming, and expensive” and are therefore disfavored (internal quotation marks omitted)
• indicating that the Medicaid Act allows states “to apply a ‘medical necessity’ test to all applicants to ensure that applicants receive medical services in order of need”
• noting that the “disparate” injuries suffered by different class members “may be better addressed through several subclasses rather than one large class”
• recognizing that class certification determinations are \fluid and fact-sensitive\
• recognizing that class certification determinations are “fluid and fact-sensitive”
• noting that any \analysis of class certification must begin with the issue of standing\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).