Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/2/1967
Chalfin v. Specter
Citations
- 426 Pa. 464
- 233 A.2d 562
- 1967 Pa. LEXIS 597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- If equitable relief was not granted immediately a later quo warranto action might necessitate removal of a mayor, with the attendant political chaos
- \[I]t is important to further note that ... the District Attorney of Philadelphia ... is Elected in municipal [and not] State-wide elections....\
- sheriff subject to Home Rule Charter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, C.J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien and Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-03· cited 80×
- Spykerman v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 49×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-01-30· cited 40×
- Schroeck v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-08-09· cited 36×
- Haynes v. OttleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-12-01· cited 32×
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-09· cited 31×
- Pettit v. NamieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-10· cited 28×
- DeFranco v. BELARDINOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 21×
- Harrington v. CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-14· cited 15×
- Cross v. MeiselE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-09-25· cited 13×
- Sprague v. FitzpatrickE.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-01-09· cited 11×
- Miller v. County of CentreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 6×
- Schwartz v. Consumers Education & Protective Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-13· cited 6×
- Doebler v. MincemoyerLycoming County Court of Common Pleas· 1969-06-26
- Ashton v. SchultzNorthampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1972-06-12
- Edmonds v. DonaldPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-10-10
- In Re: Nom. Pet Robert Jordan Appeal of: Runge, FSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-07-20
- Mafnas v. CommonwealthSup. Ct. of the Comm. of the N. Mariana Islands· 1991-08-30
- DeNome ElectionLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 1977-08-25
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-10-01· cited 63×
- Smith v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-10-26· cited 59×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-07-03· cited 59×
- Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-26· cited 51×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-14· cited 40×
- Schrader v. HeathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-07-02· cited 39×
- Commonwealth ex rel. McLaughlin v. CluleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1867-01-07· cited 38×
- Dorris v. Lloyd (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-24· cited 36×
- Kerr v. TregoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1864-01-26· cited 22×
- Gladwyne Colony, Inc. v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-01-08· cited 21×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Butterfield v. McCarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1881-11-07· cited 19×
- Commonwealth, ex rel. Gast v. PfrommSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-01-08· cited 15×
- Dorris v. Lloyd (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-24· cited 14×
- Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1934-11-26· cited 12×
- Wright v. WAGNERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-12-05· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. ConroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-05-26· cited 10×
- Butcher v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-05-23· cited 8×
- Barry v. Pottsville Borough Town CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-10-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.