Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/30/1970
Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. Bauer
Citations
- 437 Pa. 37
- 261 A.2d 573
- 1970 Pa. LEXIS 845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that district attorneys “have the power—and the duty—to represent the Commonwealth’s interests in the enforcement of its criminal laws”
- recognizing that district attorneys “have the power—and the duty—to represent the Commonwealth’s interests in the enforcement of its criminal laws”
- recognizing District Attorney’s “historical duty of representing the Commonwealth’s interest in the enforcement of its criminal laws”
- finding only that district attorney has power and duty to represent the Commonwealth's interests in law enforcement
- finding only that district attorney has power and duty to represent the Commonwealth’s interests in law enforcement
- District Attorney has \power and duty to represent the Commonwealth's interest in the enforcement of its criminal laws\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Eagent, Jones, Pomeroy, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harris v. PernsleyThird Circuit· 1987-05-15· cited 171×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 101×
- In Re Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-14· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. ManningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 41×
- Williams v. FedorM.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 39×
- Mummau v. RanckE.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-01-12· cited 36×
- Jackson v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-25· cited 27×
- Pokrandt v. ShieldsE.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-04-17· cited 24×
- Philadelphia v. Home Agency, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-23· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. ThorntonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 11×
- Sprague v. FitzpatrickE.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-01-09· cited 11×
- Harris v. PernsleyE.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-12-31· cited 9×
- Miller v. County of CentreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 6×
- Defender Ass'n of Philadelphia Amendment of Articles of Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 5×
- Carter v. City of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-04-20· cited 3×
- Lotz v. City of McKeesportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-15· cited 3×
- Harris v. PernsleyThird Circuit· 1987-06-15· cited 2×
- Zold v. Township of MantuaD. New Jersey· 1990-05-14· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. BaileyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-26· cited 1×
- Sheasley v. Jenereski (In re Sheasley)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-12-18
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-07-03· cited 59×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-14· cited 40×
- Chalfin v. SpecterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-10-02· cited 38×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-04-04· cited 20×
- In Re RichardsD. Maine· 1966-04-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.