Skip to main content

In Re Jones

Citations

  • 476 A.2d 1287
  • 505 Pa. 50
  • 1984 Pa. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judicial inquiry into the qualifications of a prospective legislator running for office violates separation of powers, but that a quo warranto action is available to test an elected legislator's right to hold public office
  • noting extensive body of case law vesting exclusive responsibility in legislative body to determine members’ qualifications
  • discussing analogous rule that one governmental body cannot determine composition of its successors
  • which holds that a court may not make a determination of whether a candidate meets the constitutional requirements for the office of a state senator on constitutional grounds alone
  • In the absence of a demonstration of a specific defect in the nomination petition under section 977, a candidate cannot be precluded from running for the office for which the nomination petition was filed
  • which holds that a court may not make a determination of whether a candidate meets the constitutional requirements for the office of a state senator on constitutional grounds alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos, Commonwealth, Code

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.