Commonwealth v. Conroy
Citations
- 267 Pa. 518
- 110 A. 166
- 1920 Pa. LEXIS 903
Syllabus
<p>Public officers — Borough councilman — Quo warranto — Mandamus — Testing right to office — Removal of councilman.</p> <p>Where a councilman of a borough is removed from his office of councilman by the borough council, and another person is elected to fill his place, such person is in office with a color of title and is a de facto councilman. If the former incumbent attacks such person’s right to occupy the office, he must do so by quo warranto proceedings, and not by mandamus.' If in quo warranto proceedings he establishes his right to the office, and the council refuses to admit him, he may then proceed by mandamus.</p>
Judges: Brown, Frazer, Moschzisker, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth ex rel. Specter v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-07-03· cited 59×
- Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-26· cited 51×
- Chalfin v. SpecterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-10-02· cited 38×
- Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-10-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.