Cesare v. Cesare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that deference is accorded to factfinding by 13 Wiretap judges are specially designated by order of the Chief Justice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-2(i
• recognizing that deference is accorded to factfinding by Family Part judges because they possess \special jurisdiction and expertise in family matters\
• observing that Act requires court to consider prior history, if any, of domestic violence
• observing that Act requires court to consider prior history, if any, of domestic violence
• holding the appellate court's review of a trial A-1193-22 13 judge's fact-finding function is limited
• holding \acts claimed by [] plaintiff to be domestic violence . . . [must] be evaluated in light of the previous history of violence between the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).