· 7/11/1995
Young v. Schering Corp.
Citations
- 660 A.2d 1153
- 141 N.J. 16
- 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1437
- 1995 N.J. LEXIS 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating CEPA represents \a partial codification\ of the common law prohibition against the retaliatory discharge of at-will employees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.