Corrente v. Corrente

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a single act of harassment, unaccompanied by violence or the threat of violence, was an insufficient basis to issue an FRO
• holding a single act of harassment, unaccompanied by violence or the threat of violence, was an insufficient basis to issue and FRO
• holding a fact finder must determine the defendant acted with the purpose to harass (citing D.C. v. T.H., 269 N.J. Super. 458, 461-62 (App. Div. 1994))
• stating that a court must \[d]raw[] the line between acts that constitute harassment for purposes of issuing a domestic violence restraining order and those that fall instead into the category of 'ordinary domestic contretemps[]'\
• explaining domestic violence \describes a pattern of abusive and controlling behavior which injures its victim\
• finding no harassment where after the parties argued, the defendant shut A-2317-19 13 off the plaintiff's phone service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).