State v. Chenique-Puey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consolidation is appropriate if evidence of the offenses sought to be severed would have been admissible at trial on the remaining charges
• noting that a \jury could interpret the order as a judicial imprimatur on the victim's testimony\
• noting that a \jury could interpret the order as a judicial imprimatur on the victim's testimony\
• explaining a severed charge can be heard by the same jury in a sequential trial
• finding restraining order inadmissible in criminal trial except \for the limited purpose of impeaching the defendant's testimony\ if defendant testifies
• finding restraining order inadmissible in criminal trial A-3699-21 16 except \for the limited purpose of impeaching the defendant's testimony\ if defendant testifies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).