State v. Gartland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that resolving issues that are both significant and likely to recur “is worth the judicial effort”
• observing that resolving issues that are both significant and likely to recur \is worth the judicial effort\
• observing that “this Court will not render advisory opinions or exercise its jurisdiction in the abstract”
• reiterating that expert testimony is admissible to help jury overcome common misconceptions about battered women when evaluating defendant's belief about need for deadly force in self-defense
• observing that resolving issues that are both significant and likely to recur \is worth the judicial effort\
• reiterating that expert testimony is admissible to help jury overcome common misconceptions about battered women when evaluating defendant’s belief about need for deadly force in self-defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).