Minner v. American Mortgage & Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tracing the history of American jurisprudence regarding the admissibility of expert testimony
• the trial court does not choose between competing reliable opinions, nor is it empowered to determine which theory is stronger
• Because the expert “based her initial results on a sufficient battery of tests,” her “results are sufficiently reliable for admissibility.”
• the trial court does not choose between competing reliable opinions, nor is it empowered to determine which theory is stronger
• “It is not necessary that an expert report have an undisputed foundation, it need only be based on valid reasoning and reliable methodology”
• “It is not necessary that an expert report have an undisputed foundation, it need only be based on valid reasoning and reliable methodology”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).