Skip to main content
· 7/11/1996

Sanderson v. International Flavors & Fragrancies, Inc.

Citations

  • 950 F. Supp. 981
  • 1996 WL 529274
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ADEs are “raw information that has not been scientifically or otherwise verified as to cause and effect”
  • a party proffering animal studies must provide good grounds for extrapolating from animals to humans
  • court determined that Perrillo, as a neuropsychologist, was not qualified to give expert testimony on toxic causation
  • neuropsychologist without medical training is not qualified to testify as an expert on toxic causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.