Cates v. REGENTS NMIM & T

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The plaintiff] did not produce evidence, circumstantial or direct, that a factfinder might reasonably use to conclude that [defendants] intended to discriminate.”
• applying McDonnell Douglas to age discrimination claim under the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).