Skip to main content
· 11/16/2006

State Ex Rel. Office of the State Engineer v. Lewis

Citations

  • 150 P.3d 375
  • 141 N.M. 1
  • 2007 NMCA 008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the parties' standing argument at the settlement stage, which was not based solely on inter se standing
  • noting the parties' standing argument at the settlement stage, which was not based solely on inter se standing
  • noting the parties’ standing argument at the settlement stage, which was not based solely on inter se standing
  • “A party that fails to present argument or authority to support a contention runs a very substantial risk that this Court will not address the contention, ... because the party is deemed to have abandoned the contention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutin, Castillo, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.