Tenth Circuit· 12/20/1999

Perry v. Woodward

Citations

199 F.3d 1126
1999 WL 1256340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when a plaintiff alleges direct evidence of discrimination, the plaintiff must establish a nexus between the allegedly discriminatory comments and the termination
holding that when a plaintiff alleges that discriminatory comments constitute direct evidence of discrimination, he must show a “nexus” between the statements and the decision to terminate plaintiff
holding that a plaintiff alleging discriminatory discharge need not show that she was replaced by a person who does not share the same protected attribute to establish her prima facie case
observing that the court “will not craft a party’s argument for him”
declining to consider whether there was an alternative basis to affirm where the appellee failed to develop an argument for affirming on an alternative basis
“While McDonnell Douglas involved a Title VII claim for failure to hire, the analytical framework it pioneered applies equally to claims brought pursuant to section 1981.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, McWilliams, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Perry v. Woodward

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.