Skip to main content
· 1/6/1992

Lowery v. Atterbury

Citations

  • 823 P.2d 313
  • 113 N.M. 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Rule 1-041(B) dismissal with prejudice, but holding that circumstances were not “so extreme as to justify dismissal”
  • stating that involuntary dismissals are limited to instances where a plaintiffs conduct is extreme and that the court must consider lesser sanctions prior to dismissal and use dismissal sparingly
  • reviewing Rule 1-041(B) NMRA 2003 dismissal with prejudice under abuse of discretion standard
  • refusing to default pro se defendants lacking sufficient funds for counsel, despite repeated violations
  • reaffirming established authority that Rule 1-041(B) does not require notice and a hearing
  • reaffirming established authority that Rule 1-041(B) does not require notice and a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Ransom, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.