Smith v. FDC Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in a race and age discrimination lawsuit, Plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant discriminated against him or her because of his or her race or age
• holding that in a race and age discrimination lawsuit, Plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant discriminated against him or her because of his or her race or age
• holding that, under Rule 1-037 NMRA, only contempt is available as a discovery sanction against a nonparty; the broader sanctions available under Rule 1-037(B)(2) “may only be directed against a nonresponsive party ”
• holding that, in some instances, the fourth element of prima facie case of discrimination is whether someone from outside the employee’s protected class filled the employee’s position
• holding the trial court did not err when it found that ageist statements made to discharged employee represented direct evidence of age discrimination
• holding the trial court did not err when it found that ageist statements made to discharged employee represented direct evidence of age discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).