James Perruquet v. Kenneth R. Briley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner drew “enough of a connection between his right to due process and the trial court’s. . .instructional errors” to state cognizable habeas claim
• holding that a federal district court faced with a petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims may deny it on the merits or dismiss it without prejudice
• holding that a federal district court faced with a petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims may deny it on the merits or dismiss it without prejudice
• holding that the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating an exception to procedural default
• holding that the petitioner bears the burden of establishing an exception to procedural default
• holding that the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating an exception to procedural default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).