First Circuit· 10/6/2014
Castaneda v. Souza
Citations
- 769 F.3d 32
- 2014 WL 4976140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “when” means “as soon as,” as in, “I’ll call you when I get there”
- noting' how in a maritime statute, the phrases “in every such case” and “in every case” were used repeatedly in conjunction with “when” to qualify its, meaning
- interpreting “when” as signifying that DHS can subject an alien to mandatory detention only if it detains the alien at or around the time the alien is released from criminal custody
- “Mandatory detention of individuals such as the petitioners appears arbitrary on its face.”
- \Mandatory detention of individuals such as the petitioners appears arbitrary on its face.\
- petitioners each detained four to five years after convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Dyk, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lora v. ShanahanSecond Circuit· 2015-10-28· cited 113×
- Castañeda v. SouzaFirst Circuit· 2015-12-23· cited 34×
- Minto v. DeckerS.D. New York· 2015-06-05· cited 20×
- Culwick v. WoodE.D. New York· 2019-05-18· cited 20×
- Gordon v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2016-11-21· cited 18×
- Young v. AvilesS.D. New York· 2015-03-26· cited 14×
- Rodriguez v. ShanahanS.D. New York· 2015-01-30· cited 5×
- Reynoso v. AvilesS.D. New York· 2015-02-05· cited 5×
- Sutherland v. ShanahanS.D. New York· 2015-06-05
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 3,847×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 2,046×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court· 2003-04-29· cited 1,378×
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,143×
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 1,133×
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 1,097×
- Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court· 1952-03-10· cited 717×
- Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2003-01-15· cited 416×
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 393×
- Vijendra K. Singh v HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-03-31· cited 357×
- United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 232×
- Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.First Circuit· 1980-10-17· cited 197×
- Casas-Castrillon v. Department of Homeland SecurityNinth Circuit· 2008-07-25· cited 144×
- Hoang Minh Ly v. Mark B. Hansen, James Ziglar, and John AshcroftSixth Circuit· 2004-03-30· cited 126×
- SKF USA, Inc. v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionFederal Circuit· 2009-02-19· cited 87×
- JOSEPHBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 79×
- Saysana v. GillenFirst Circuit· 2009-12-22· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.