Brock v. Pierce County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Government’s failure to observe a 120-day statutory deadline did not deprive it of authority under the statute
• holding that the Government's failure to observe a 120-day statutory deadline did not deprive it of authority under the statute
• holding that government agencies are not necessarily divested of power to act after specific date by which statute commands that particular action \shall\ be taken
• holding that the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act’s requirement that the Secretary of Labor “shall” take action within 120 days was not jurisdictional
• holding that the Secretary of Labor did not lose authority to recover funds despite his failure to comply with the requirement that he “shall” act “within 120 days”
• holding that floor statements are valid indicators of congressional intent to the extent that they \are consistent with the statutory language\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).