Castaneda Castillo v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the persecutor bar “presumptively . . . should be read not to apply to petitioner” if his testimony that he knew nothing of plans for a massacre that his actions objectively assisted were accepted
• noting that remanding to the BIA is the \ordinary course\ where the record does not \compel[]\ a decision in the petitioner's favor
• remanding \to allow the matter to be considered anew under the proper legal standards\
• remanding “to allow the matter to be considered anew under the proper legal standards”
• \This would be a different case if the evidence clearly established that Castañeda had guilty knowledge[.]\
• “[A] suit for prospective injunctive relief provides a narrow, but 23 well-established, exception to Eleventh Amendment immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).