Skip to main content
First Circuit· 10/21/2022

H.H. v. Garland

Citations

  • 52 F.4th 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating and remanding BIA decision after concluding agency failed to adequately articulate its reasoning on non-expert issue
  • noting auxiliary aids only need to be 1 available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.