Saleh Capric, Camila Capric, Albert Capric, and Elvis Capric v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discrepancies that go to the heart of the claim are most probative of an adverse credibility determination
• holding that a petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on a due process claim
• stating that “it is reasonable to expect particularly invasive events to be mentioned in asylum applications”
• noting that persecution can include “confiscation of property, surveillance, beatings, torture, [and] behavior that threatens the same. . .” (citations omitted)
• concluding prejudice occurs when the due process transgression is “likely to impact the results of the proceedings”
• rejecting “attempt to cloak a substantial evidence challenge to the IJ’s decision in due process constitutional garb”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).