Skip to main content

Clemmons v. State

Citations

  • 720 A.2d 1170
  • 352 Md. 49
  • 1998 Md. LEXIS 942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that \[i]t is unmistakably clear\ that substantive use of the codefendant's guilty plea \was prejudicial\
  • explaining that “ordinarily, the conviction or guilty plea of a co-perpetrator may not be used as substantive evidence of another’s guilt” and collecting cases
  • finding that the trial court’s error in admitting evidence that a co-defendant had pled guilty to the same crime was not harmless and stating that the outcome of the case “depended largely on credibility — which of two versions the jury was going to believe
  • “[OJrdinarily, the conviction or guilty plea of a co-perpetrator may not be used as substantive evidence of another’s guilt.” (emphasis added)
  • collecting cases from numerous jurisdictions that demonstrate this principle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.